Skip to main content

How to Save the Palestinians

Some years ago, George Ball wrote an article entitled: The Middle East: How to Save Israel in Spite of Herself.  I remember observing at the time that if he knew anything of Jewish faith it should be that the last thing Israel wanted was a savior.  In it he propounded, as though it were new, the essential formulation of the most consistent foreign policy America has.  That is: that if Israel returns land to its Arab neighbors there will be peace in the Middle East.  To this end, America has bullied and bribed Israel since 1948.  Given the stated objective, this has not been a particularly successful policy.  Until one realizes that by “peace,” America means status quo.  America, in particular President Truman, was essential to the founding of Israel.  Since then, I suspect that without our help Israel would have achieved a position of stability and respect in the community of nations that has been denied her. By our consistent policy of forcing Israel to concede land, we have forced Israel to concede sovereignty and identity as a nation.  Given that history, it is not surprising that most Israelis are beyond the limits of reason.
  
There has been some question of Palestinian legitimacy.  These arguments note the small numbers of Palestinians actually expelled from Israel and view the creation of the Palestinian people as a function of United Nations relief. The detachment of military units and financial aid from other nations supports these views.  But if six million, or more, people view themselves as Palestinians that will suffice.  The questioning of legitimacy is a perilous and slippery slope.
  
There are those who believe that Israel has undue influence within the United States.  The essential function of the Israel lobby in American politics is to keep up the price.  This was made clear during Desert Storm.  At the same time, that Israel was begging for loan guarantees to borrow ten billion, Saud was writing checks for fifty billion for Desert Storm.  This difference is orders of magnitude.  As this much ambiguity doesn’t make for a sound bite, I doubt that America is going to be much help.
  
The Palestinian position seems the most foolish.  Does anyone believe that another nation in the Middle East is going to make things more peaceful?  The Palestinian campaign to install themselves in a reservation between Jordan and Israel without oil or water can only be the product of foreign sponsorship.  It doesn’t make sense in a democracy to demand disenfranchisement.  The Palestinians can put Israel on the spot so easily, put up or shut up, in or out, what’s it going to be?  If the Palestinians reversed position and demanded full citizenship, service in the army, etc. the world would finally have to appreciate their situation.  They would be entering the arena of modern discourse.
  
Of course, neither the Palestinians nor the Israelis, trapped in the discussion of sovereignty, can appear to recognize this option.  For the Israelis, Palestinian enfranchisement is far more terrifying than Palestinian sovereignty. They would probably offer the Palestinians Tel-Aviv rather than citizenship. Given the heterogeneity of the Palestinian people one has to wonder where their nation building would stop, is each town going to be its own nation?  Can the Palestinians and the Israelis share a nation?  Can the Israelis share a nation?  This is the wonder of democracy.  The United States is shared between two of the bitterest opponents in the history of the world: North and South.  We don’t like each other, but we somehow manage. Although we do seem to have a particular affinity for other peoples civil wars, always supporting the south.

It is unfair to demand exceptional behavior of Israel.  Israel is a nation in the Middle East, no more, no less.  For instance, Israel doesn’t mistreat its Palestinians any more than other nations mistreat theirs.  However, someday, Israel, like all nations, will have to decide if it’s a religious artifact or a nation. Once the Palestinians enter Israeli political life, all questions are on the table, the flag, the nation, its identity.  Obviously the Palestinians will not be welcomed, the future never is.  
Therefore, we see that Hamas, the PLO, or something like it, is essential to Israeli policy.  What they do is frame the discussion and prevent the terrifying option of enfranchisement.  
Palestinians entering Israel’s political life would not be a peaceful solution. Success would be the most dangerous result.  Israel, or whatever its name would be, would be a modern democracy in the Middle East.  This would terrify the world.  It’s likely that everyone would attack them. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please do not post how you agree with me.

Popular posts from this blog

Sail Boarding

  I had been sail boarding with my friends in Lake Michigan with little success. Being male, we used our backs rather than our brains. We took turns wrestling the board while the rest of us considered the futility of our meaningless existence on the beach. In the 80’s Chicago winters were extreme enough to push me into the Caribbean. Going for two weeks meant I paid less in air fare. This also meant that the resort boards were unused over the weekend, when everyone else was in transit. In fairness to my friends, Lake Michigan is choppier and less buoyant than the ocean. By now I knew to paddle out to deep water and fall off the board, rather than on the board. Standing on the board, holding the line connected to the boom where it joins the mast, I reckoned the wind direction and maneuvered the sail to the opposite side. I wasn’t going to let the sail push me off again. I gently lifted the sail slightly out of the water. The water fell out of the uplifted hollow mast. The mast and...
Post a Comment
Read more

Critical Error: Start menu and Cortana aren't working. We'll try to fix this for you the next time you sign in. /avast

Sorry don't know where else to post. Lot of bloviating. There are probably a lot of reasons for this dumb message and the messages are similar. Good argument for better messaging. What seems to be happening in my case is that Avast, what do you want, it's free, is pushing out a software upgrade for windows 10 using its windows 7 program. This breaks everything better than a virus could.  If you can bring up Avast there will be a message that a program upgrade is waiting in the software updates section, pushing that through, restarting each time it asked, fixed it for me. Then it broke again. Guessing Avast is trying to tell me something, perhaps pay them. Uninstalled Avast then things worked again. Avast sent me a very nice email explaining how to uninstall. If you don't want their web service then troubleshoot program(right click) gets you to control panel. Hello defender.
Post a Comment
Read more

Condescending Saviors

  I wrote this shortly after the Democratic Convention: This recent convention solidified five deficiencies of the Democratic Party. Rather than addressing these well-known criticisms, the liberal elite, the party owned them with a nice helping of Jingo. One is their use of the term middle class. Looking down from the upper I suppose what they see is the middle class. I wrote about class in my book, Another Data Processing Book. In US land we have nine classes, a tic tac toe board, upper, middle and lower both ways: Upper upper Middle upper Lower upper Upper middle Middle middle Lower middle Upper lower Middle lower Lower lower   Most of us are middle-lower and lower-lower. There is a big bulb at the bottom with a long tail stretching out into the distance. Somewhere on that tail you can parse out a small segment that contains the population middle-middle. We aren’t in it, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Co-op College

  According to their web site, 2024, at University of Chicago 43% of the teachers are professors. This is better than most schools. By third or fourth year an undergraduate will be taking instruction from a professor. Again, the site says the average pay of a professor at University of Chicago is $165,000. Nonetheless, most tuition money does not go to instruction. At the old Columbia College in Chicago graduation was a great shame. Nowadays Columbia is more collegiate. It used to be more vocational.   The instructors were professionals in their fields. Graduation meant you hadn’t been hired. If schools are training professionals, their graduation rate should suffer, just as in sports. Conversely why take training from people who can’t find work? Corporate training can be adversarial: how would you train your competition? I propose a new form of institution. Rather than a degree I propose an open transcript. Everyone can see your grades. Enrolling in the Co-operative Colle...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rebuild Los Angeles

Start with fire. You are going to build a fireproof house. Once you have a plan to build a fireproof Los Angeles house build an architectural model using the same materials, say an aluminum foil roof etc. Then take a blow torch and hold it to your model for a day. Dena means valley, Pasadena, Altadena…A valley is a wind tunnel. Say you have a surviving model. Then blast it with your garden hose, raising the water level to half the level of your model. Desert valleys flood. Make sure your model is somehow anchored, so it doesn’t float or slip away. Check your model for mold. The seals on your model must survive fire and flood. Then take a large pail of gravel and dump the gravel from some height on the steel framed model with the fancy Swiss made seals. Valleys also have rockslides. Make sure your model can withstand the landslide without moving. After that, take the entire diorama, including the model, lift it up and bang it on the table as hard as you can. Earthquake proof means...
Post a Comment
Read more

Worst President

1. Kennedy nearly blew up the world. Eisenhower had been waving the bomb around but now there was reprisal. Berlin, Bay of Pigs, Missile Crisis, Assassination, it was called brinkmanship. 2. Reagan was just running his mouth, but middle management on both sides was listening. Brave Petrov, Able Archer, Fleetex, KAL 007, Reagan calmed down after he was shot. Both Irishmen believed they had a special relationship with the Soviet Union. 3. Jefferson unleashed Napoleon on Europe. The only real consequence of the Louisiana Purchase was funding Napoleon. Jefferson said he expected Napoleon to attack the British, but the French direction was clear after the Seven Years’ War.   Napoleon was a general not an admiral. Dropping guns in Haiti, backstabbing Washington on the loan, stopping the tobacco deal, don’t say it turned out for the best. We don’t know what would have happened. Jefferson was slime. 4. Wilson’s intervention in World War I led to World War II. 5. Teddy Rooseve...
Post a Comment
Read more