Crossing disciplines can be a source for inspiration and embarrassment. BioNTech recently made an announcement of 90% effectiveness. I suspect that the oncologists meant 90% in the body and the virologists heard 90% in the population.
BioNTech, as everyone else, is targeting the heads that pop up on the virus when it is about to infect. They have recognized that the white blood cell response is inadequate and they are conflicting with the virus at the cell wall. The company’s specialty is provoking this cellular response without the mediation of white blood cells. This makes perfect sense with tumors.
The white blood cells keep immune memory. Covid19 virus coats in our glycan and thereby avoids white blood cell response. The BioNTech candidate avoids this issue but it can’t confer lasting immunity.
If we surround an Ebola spot outbreak with this type
of intervention, it should be effective. That doesn’t mean that the population
can go back to passing around dead bodies. In the United States, we have 10
million reported sick. Using the multiple of 10 given by various studies, we
have 100 million true infected, or about one third of our population.
The danger is in the use of the word vaccine. People
hear vaccine and they think the epidemic is finished. Please use the word
treatment. This is not a vaccine. It is an immune response treatment.
No comments:
Post a Comment