Back when Chicago had winters, I once dragged myself through the slush into a travel agency and said:
-Get me out
of here.
I hate to
travel. There is some remarkable geology. In Lacrosse Wisconsin there are
bluffs. There is a fun mix of prosaic and profane seeing people living on and
around the bluffs.
There are
also the plaques. In Pennsylvania there is mention of Jumonville. George
Washington at the age of twenty murdered Jumonville causing the French and
Indian War which lead to the Seven Years’ War, which lead to our revolution. The revolution was not popular, ask the Tories, who respected the king, paid their debts, and opposed slavery.
The Evanston
Illinois light house, built in 1873 after the North was freed of the South’s
hatred of boondoggle. Why of all the stretches of sand along Lake Michigan was
the light house built here? The light house was an emotional reaction to the
sinking of the Lady Elgin in 1860. In Milwaukee there is a wonderful plaque
explaining that the Irish on the Lady Elgin had it coming. The Germans wanted
to secede from the Union in opposition to slavery. The Irish wanted to stay in.
The site of
Pickett’s Charge in Gettysburg.
I hate the
St. Louis Arch. They try to warn you: claustrophobia, acrophobia, and
ochlophobia. They tell you don’t go up there. Due to construction we had to buy
tickets in the museum. There was a plaque there explaining that there weren’t
many Blacks in St Louis before the Civil War. The Irish were taking the work. It
was cheaper to hire an Irishman for a day than keep a slave for life. Dred
Scott was pissed that his owners were sending him out to find jobs.
When the
Supreme Court uses arguments like natural law or constructionism, they are
saying they don’t have anything else. This wasn’t the case with slavery. All
stupid Taney had to say was that slavery was in the Constitution. It would have
been nice if Taney had ruled that if you didn’t have work, you were no longer a
slave. Taney would have been discovering a right under the 9th
amendment. The 9th is kind of a fun meta-amendment. When the Supreme
Court argues that a right isn’t covered under the Constitution, they are
ignoring the 9th. We fought a war to remove slavery from the
Constitution.
The slave
breeding border states would have hated such a decision. They made money
selling slaves south.
Keeping the
Union was not popular. It was not the peoples will. Lincoln got in on a three
way, another example of the Voters Paradox. After the putative end of the war,
Republicans dragged the army up to vote and dumped the territories into the
count. Fortunately, the Southern raids infuriated the border states. The
Democratic platform was to concede the war to the South. The South didn’t vote,
we had won by force of arms and freeing the slaves. When the Southern property
walked off, their financial value collapsed. The Northern banks were furious
with Lincoln, they thought they were going to collect on their loans. McClellan
got 45% of the vote in the North.
Rather than
lining the rebels against a wall and shooting them as a sovereign nation ought,
goofy Johnson followed Ceasar’s advice and pardoned them. Even so, the 14th
amendment said the rebels could no longer run for office. There was no folderol
about process, popular will or which office. A sovereign state should not allow
traitors to hold office, regardless of the peoples will. If you want to change
the Constitution, we have process for that. Please don’t argue that an
amendment is unconstitutional.
I despise
the 2nd amendment. It is ambiguous and confusing. The Supreme court
shouldn’t rule against it. We should amend the Constitution to explicitly
return that power to the states.
The first
amendment was too mealy mouthed about government supporting religion. It seems
obvious that tax money should not go to religions. Stop faith-based grants.
Faith-based worked fine when it is Greek Orthodox taking care of Ukrainians. It
shamelessly falls to pieces when it is Catholics serving Venezuelans. The Cruz
and DeSantos Catholics are happy with undocumented immigrants. Undocumented
don’t get Social Security, Minimum Wage, Unemployment, or Workmen’s
Compensation. MAGA is opposed to refugees, people with status who don’t do as
they are told, and who may someday vote.
Catholic
“charities” is also taking tax money to oppose the rights of equality and
privacy.
MAGA isn’t
fascist. Fascists had ideals. Maga is a pseudo nihilist, sometimes
antiimperialist, pro-Russian belief in slavery and forced pregnancy. Maga wants
crippled orphan children working 12-hour shifts in packing plants.
Popular will overriding the law is a fascist argument.
The only way individual Democrats can fight for Reconstruction is to crossover to the
Republican primaries and vote for Haley. At least Haley hasn't shipped immigrants.