Sunday, April 11, 2021
Street Rap
When Thatcher remonstrated with Reagan over this breach of international law and convention, Reagan responded that he wanted some nutmeg for his eggnog. This was just after England had defended the Falklands.
While this remark is appropriate within the history of the spice trade, in 1988 Grenada exported 2,230 tons of nutmeg and 256 tons of mace for a total export value of $15,761,107. This was a good year. Let us find the street value. 2,486 tons is 87,691,069 ounces. I have a price of 6 ounces is $10 listed on the internet currently. Divided by 6 is 14,615,178. Times $10 gives a markup of more than 10 times the export value. Somewhere in that 100 million there might be funds to influence policy.
The tragedy of the commons as applied to institutions, bribes, is precisely because the profit of such actions far exceeds the expense. Congress scrounging for contributions for example. Winners get to fix the game is the whole point of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations. Military is a sunk cost.
Take the financial value of the nutmeg. The trade in nutmeg supports various business institutions. The multiplier of financial value is constrained by the reserve requirement. If the reserve requirement is 20% then the multiplier will be 5. There is also interest and the future value of money. Taking an arbitrary value of 5 as the multiplier times $100 million, on an annual basis, almost sounds like money.
The financial value of nutmeg is constrained by its earnings and uncertainty. More fungible assets, oil reserves, undeveloped land, don’t have that limitation. Each financial transaction requires reassessment of the asset. The development of land or the pumping of oil can crash their financial value because they are now associated with earnings. Dreams sell. It is a shame that we don’t have the technology to claim oil reserves without digging and then capping a well.
In 2021, China is harassing the Philippines over their oil. This seems silly. Where is the Philippines getting the financing to develop their oil? What is the market for the Philippine oil? All that is being determined is which Chinese company will develop the oil. Until one realizes that it is the financial value of the Philippine oil reserves that turns Chinese Communists into slathering greedy imperialists. We need to find means for nations and their populations to profit from the trade in financial value of their assets.
Returning to the events of our invasion of Grenada: Maurice Bishop, the Prime Minister of Grenada, negotiated a better price for Grenada’s nutmeg. Within the month, Bernard Coard with the support of Cuba overthrew and murdered Bishop. An important American principle had been violated. It is yet another humiliation that our founders chose our name in the belief that we would one day physically cover two continents. As it is, we dominate those two continents. The principle is that if you are going to fix it in the Caribbean, you don’t go to Cuba, you come to US’ns. After the US invasion, Grenada lost Russia as the largest and most generous buyer of its nutmeg for a time.
The financial value of Grenada itself can be understood as its debt. Through debt restructuring, grants, tourism, and selling passports enterprising Grenada reduced its debt from just under a billion US dollars in 2015 to 720 million in 2019. This is an island of 112,523 people and 134.6 square miles. In 2019 unemployment was 15.2%. In 2018 debt was 62.7% of GDP. I Don’t know how the population would have fared under General Austin. Austin took over from Coard for six days before our invasion. Today the primary industry of Grenada is debt. President Reagan’s comment was factually invalid, the invasion was not about nutmeg. The statement was in the correct spirit.
Applying the principles of gestalt, the event of the Grenada invasion took place in the context of the United States of America Empire. A good example is the career of Aristide, the prime minister of Haiti. When Aristide was overthrown in 1991, the Haitians didn’t waste time singing or smuggling guns, they lobbied Washington until we sent forces to put him back. This is how to deal with Empire. Unfortunately, drug cartels and industrialists have more clout, and Aristide was back out again. Haitian debt is a fiction. As Haiti has no autonomy the debt is treated as ours and we pay the interest. Statehood for Haiti.
Whispers in the boardroom bring deaths in the jungle. If we are to get past the flutter and theater, we must understand the profit.
Tuesday, February 23, 2021
Privacy
I
spent a year in Dallas one week. Southern Methodist University had volunteered
as the crash test dummy for the beta release of our library software. Wandering
down the hall, I noticed a PC. I got on and brought up our company’s web site.
It was 1995. When I attempted to reach our mainframe, a firewall stopped me. I
knew it was possible to reach it from the internet so I called up our hex
support and told them:
-The
only people you are blocking are customers and employees.
Support
graciously allowed me in. Normally we come back from these jaunts with scraps
of paper trying to remember what we did. This time I put my changes in our source
base and had it reinstalled. Monday morning, I hit the office clean. Then I
made it a habit to check SMU for their dumps each day and brought them across
the web.
The
same situation is happening for privacy. Let us review phone surveillance. In
the American Civil War, soldiers realized that rather than knocking over
telegraph lines it was possible to toss a wire over the line and through
inductance over hear the enemy’s messages with an earpiece. Sometimes
inductance would operate the opposite way and operators would recognize that
they were being monitored. Then the operators might send false information or
encoded messages. Even when the code is unbroken, the fact of coded messages is
useful.
In
World War I communication wires were strung across battlefields. This made it worthwhile to crawl out, splice
the line and steal communications. If you could be certain of the result, this
might lead to false information being sent or even giving false orders to the
enemy. Sometimes they communicated audibly rather than Morse code.
The
FBI made use of this technology during prohibition. They could not make
recordings. Sometimes transcripts were presented in court. More often they made
use of the information to provocateur or build cases. Sometimes they used parallel
construction, claiming a “reliable informant”.
By
the fifties phone tapping became common. Sometimes wire recorders were used.
Eventually a German company came up with a phone switching device that allowed
phone companies to provide surveillance as a service. In our new century
surveillance is almost a by-product of digital compression and server
technology. Nowadays surveillance, even video surveillance, is a matter of
extending backup retention.
Old
fashioned taps would be of little use on a digitized compressed signal. Even
listening devices, bugs, use cell phone technology. It is much safer and more
discrete to communicate as a cell phone than an analog radio signal. Why carry
around some super spy recorder when you can just turn on your cell phone recording?
A
major issue is identification. Traditionally credit bureaus identify us. Same
name, similar birthdate, social security, address, phone, probably the same
person. Credit agencies should be tracking our user IDs, IP addresses, email,
but so far have not had the inclination. Marketers have developed advertising ID.
Government agencies do their best. Sometimes government agencies check credit.
Those requests are tracked.
For
government or marketing purposes similar persons may have similar behavior and
ambiguous identity is acceptable.
The
only two groups that are explicitly denied our information are medical and law
enforcement. This is bizarre. If you want doctors and police to behave
intelligently, they have to know who you are. Just as my support people
conscientiously installed their firewall, we are putting ours in the wrong
place.
Friday, December 18, 2020
Pfizer Study
Safety
and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine has come out in the New England
Journal of Medicine. I was wrong again. I thought the 95% was a consequence of
confusion between oncology and epidemiology. The study was conducted by Pfizer.
I had thought it was fortuitous that an mRNA vaccine that avoids the issue of
white blood cell response was easier to develop.
The study:
“RESULTS
A total of
43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections:
21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19
with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to
receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was
95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6).
Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups
defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the
presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset
after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2
recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term,
mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence
of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo
groups.”
Dropping the
statistical blessing they divided 8 by 162 and got 0.0493827160493827 or 5%.
100% - 5% gives 95%. Another way to say this is: 8 of 21,720 vaccinated
participants, or .037% reported sick. 162
of 21,728 placebo participants or .75% reported sick.
The study
was monitored by survey:
“With the
use of an interactive Web-based system,”
According to
the protocol, blood samples were taken. I see no record that positive results
were excluded. I see no reporting of the blood immune results at all. Swab
tests are unreliable.
“Overall,
BNT162b2 recipients reported more local reactions than placebo recipients.”
Participating
in the study is itself a selection factor. The participants knew by their
reactions whether they had received the placebo or the vaccine. Those who
thought they had received the vaccine were more likely to dismiss symptoms.
Those who thought they received the placebo were more likely to report them.
Everyone
vaccinated should then show a positive blood test, presence of antibodies. It
is more certain that a placebo candidate is sick. Vaccinated candidates who
report sick have to report and get accurately swabbed within four days.
This is a busted study.
At this
point you may wail:
-OK, forget
the study! Look at the science!
The research
money was sucked up by the drug companies. There is no science. All we have is
your recipe.
Speculation:
(This is where I will be wrong again.)
1. I speculate that our infection by
Sars-Cov-2 of our symbiotic or pathogenic cells creates the virus that provokes
our immune response. I am trying to explain how a glycan coated virus triggers
immunity. Do mRNA vaccines communicate to our foreign cells?
2. Are the adverse reactions a
consequence of prior infection? I bet that the 8 infected vaccinated
participants did not have adverse reactions. I am sure that they had prior
negative blood tests. This study may have been an expensive survey of prior
infection.
3. Does the vaccine treat existing
illness? Obviously not, or it would have been reported. Why not? Does it make
the illness worse? I predict this question will be the source of most
resistance to vaccination. Please don’t compare to existing vaccines. Creating
mRNA should be palliative.
Recommendations:
1. Proficiency in Statistics must be a
requirement for the medical profession.
2. Reported blood immune tests before
and after such studies. I expect that all vaccinated participants will have a
positive test. This would be a good audit.
3. Disaster that all the research money
was given to drug companies. First look at the problem, then examine the
problem, when you are done – study the problem.
I am a courteous person. I won’t refuse a vaccine. I have little hope for them.
Saturday, December 5, 2020
Covid19 Infects Foreign Cells
Foreign
cells have the ability to resist our immune system. When Sars-Cov2 infects a
foreign cell, it will be coated in that cell’s glycan. Depending on the cell
that is infected the new virus will either awaken our immune response or avoid
it. In those cases where the glycan is part of the foreign cells immune
defense, the new virus will also have that capability. This speculation is to
explain why some people are more infectious.
When
Sars-Cov2 infects strep for instance, those virus particles may be transmitted
more easily.
Saturday, November 28, 2020
Covid19 Questions
- What events pop the heads? Give specific events, no mumbling about ACE2 receptors or glycan reactions.
- Why don’t owls eat all the bats? No
mightabes or whatabouts. It mightabe my ass.
- Do the heads have to pop for
infection to occur? As a male, I would think so. We don’t even know that much.
- What is immune memory? Thymus is
involved.
- Why is there any immune reaction?
Covid19 is covered in our glycan.
- How are we infected by a virus
covered in foreign glycan?
- Is there any distinction between the
glycoprotein covering the virus and our own? If there is such a distinction, is
it consistent?
- What are the specific immune events
at the cell wall? Again, no mumbling about pathways or mightabes.
- What clears the virus?
- Does the virus clear? Please don’t
test this with immune reaction.
- What is the progression of the
disease?
- Is HIV a coronavirus?
Get your flu
shot. Get a Covid19 vaccine when it comes. Stay away from people. Don’t be a
jerk. Don’t argue by metaphor or analogy. Every illness is different.
Friday, November 13, 2020
Covid19 Isn’t Cancer
Crossing disciplines can be a source for inspiration and embarrassment. BioNTech recently made an announcement of 90% effectiveness. I suspect that the oncologists meant 90% in the body and the virologists heard 90% in the population.
BioNTech, as everyone else, is targeting the heads that pop up on the virus when it is about to infect. They have recognized that the white blood cell response is inadequate and they are conflicting with the virus at the cell wall. The company’s specialty is provoking this cellular response without the mediation of white blood cells. This makes perfect sense with tumors.
The white blood cells keep immune memory. Covid19 virus coats in our glycan and thereby avoids white blood cell response. The BioNTech candidate avoids this issue but it can’t confer lasting immunity.
If we surround an Ebola spot outbreak with this type
of intervention, it should be effective. That doesn’t mean that the population
can go back to passing around dead bodies. In the United States, we have 10
million reported sick. Using the multiple of 10 given by various studies, we
have 100 million true infected, or about one third of our population.
The danger is in the use of the word vaccine. People
hear vaccine and they think the epidemic is finished. Please use the word
treatment. This is not a vaccine. It is an immune response treatment.
Tuesday, September 8, 2020
Sars-Cov-2 Update
Pandemic means that we don’t know anything. If we knew how to cope, it wouldn’t be a pandemic. The drug companies got all the research money. The few researchers who remain have cobbled together a few studies. One of the studies is a computer model showing how the heads pop up on the virus when the glycan stimulus occurs. We don’t know what events raise the heads. Given that the virus leaves the bat on two ends, I suggest that two of the events are loud noise and bile. Infection must occur when the virus is inside us. Another event must be a cell nibbling on the virus glycan. It seems reasonable that the heads have to rise for the virus to infect.
When you
encounter a foreign virus where the heads haven’t popped, your white blood
cells should recognize foreign glycan and consume the virus. Once the heads
have popped it should be possible for the virus to encounter one of your other
cells before your white blood cell and infect it. The virus produced by your
cell would have your glycan and be ignored by your immune response. When one of
your cells nibbles the virus glycan and pops the heads, it is too late for your
immune response. How do we get an immune response? Foreign cells coexisting in
our body would not produce virus with the correct glycan coat when they are
infected. White blood cells consume the foreign virus and coagulation occurs. I
suspect that in bats Sars-Cov-2 favors foreign cells. Perhaps it gets confused
in us. Eventually liver function recognizes aged glycan and diminishes the
viral load.
Just as
conservators strip varnish applied by the artist so that we can admire the
colors, researchers wash away the glycan to show the virus structure. A
coronavirus is different. The glycan defends the virus from the protein immune
response. All the suppositions based on influenza are invalid. Simply raising
the immune response will fail. Is HIV a coronavirus?
Drug company
executives, recognizing futility, are shoveling their stock out as fast as they
can. SEC criticized this as unseemly, giving away the game.
There is a
new paper about bradykinin storms as opposed to cytokine storms. The argument
is about the nature of the immune response crisis that occurs and their
associated therapies. Whether it is a B-storm or a C-storm, I ask what
distinguishes our interior from that of a bat. The virus appears to coexist
amicably in bats. I am hanging on to the idea that these storms result from
medication.
As
population increases, more pandemics will occur. There will be pandemics after
this one. The first major change we must make is that statistics, I hate
statistics, has to be a premedical qualification. I’m talking about a
full-throat course, designing studies, making statistical arguments, at least
as difficult as biochemistry. Doctors’ deficiency in statistics makes them
easier prey for drug companies. The surgical textbooks are particularly
egregious. Thoroughly slap anyone who says medicine is an art. Just because
someone gets better doesn’t mean it worked. If you release the results of your
study early, that demonstrates bias and your study is bogus.
We must
immediately pull the licenses of the killer quacks. They are not getting any
smarter. There is no shortage of doctors. Everyone who prescribed garbage has to
go. We cannot leave them for the next pandemic.
If you do
not have a real study or are emptying the sick ward, then shut the fuck up.
Please don’t give hope or find things for hospital personnel to do.
Stanford
started with a reasonable study demonstrating that more people were sick than
were reported. They then used that revelation to spew hokum. Raze Stanford and
plant it to roses. There is no shortage
of Universities. The University of Pennsylvania gave a degree to someone who
can’t read. I know it was a joke degree in real estate but it had their name on
it. We can survive without the University of Pennsylvania. Even Harvard didn’t
admit Joe Kennedy. There is a
questionable study from St. Louis University. I expect that after review the
University will call to account. It is difficult to conduct a study in a war
zone when one wants to free up beds. Yogis, not pragmatists should administer
studies.
Occasionally
I scrape the Worldometers site for the sick data and paste it into a
spreadsheet. I then create columns for crude mortality rate, medical efficiency,
growth, testing effectiveness and true sick rate. Medical efficiency, dead over sick, gives a
sense of testing coverage and medical response. Deviation from 4% medical
efficiency suggests under reporting of dead or sick. Crude mortality is
percentage of deaths over closed cases. It is interesting to see who blocks
reporting of crude mortality. Growth is what I call active over total cases. For
true sick multiply ten times reported sick over the population. Testing
effectiveness is tests over cases. If testing effectiveness is high, they are
only testing the dead. Too low and they are indulging the privileged. It is
clear that the data is sketchy. The
results determine policy.
The tests
are inadequate. Fecal tests may be the most accurate.
Once saturation has occurred, there will be a constant mortality rate and we can await the next pandemic.
Sunday, August 2, 2020
How SARS-Cov-2 Works
Building out
my five earlier posts, one mistake is framing as influenza. SARS-Cov-2 is a
coronavirus. Those little arms aren’t sexual selection. They aren’t cute. They
hold onto glycan. My frame bases on two facts, glycan and bats.
If you are
into rage, rage pleases some people, consider all the researchers staring into
the abyss, making their tiny incremental gains in knowledge and technique. They
were reserving their lab equipment, writing their grant proposals, studying
HIV, Ebola, H1N1, etc. The discovery they were converging on was the relation
between glycan and protein along the cell wall. This molecular process is
complex and difficult to discern. Glycan is just as complex as protein. The research is cancelled. Government
gave the money for all those projects to drug companies.
Drug
companies are drug companies. They are perfecting their manufacturing process
to be ready for the vaccine. They are doing clinical trials for various
expensive cocktails of treatments. If something doesn’t work, they combine it
with something else. They do not stare into the abyss and try to figure out
what question to ask. I sometimes encounter a desperate research article trying
to show how understanding the interaction between glycan and protein is
essential to this problem. Those articles don’t come from drug companies.
Recently Chinese spies were trying to steal drug company research. They must be
communists. I doubt there is anything worth stealing.
Coronavirus
has evolved to shield itself with glycan from the immune system. You don’t want
our immune system to attack our own glycan. The various vaccines predicate on
protein interaction. That is not how coronavirus works. SARS-Cov-2 has evolved
in bats to have long arms and a very thick shroud of glycan, so that no protein
is exposed.
A study, Shielding
and Beyond: The Roles of Glycans in SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein, was published
on bioRxiv.org June 12, 2020, gives a computer model of the heads
extending above the glycan. It doesn’t
explain what triggers the extension of the heads. If a virus is inactive, that
is its heads haven’t popped, our white blood cells recognize foreign glycan and
consume it. How do the heads pop?
SARS-Cov-2 leaves bats as fecal and saliva aerosol. I think SARS-Cov-2
has a molecular memory from bats of vibration and bile. Bats shriek to
echolocate. This might explain Manhattan. Manhattan hum raises the sound level.
Once the
heads have popped, SARS-Cov-2 may encounter one of our other cells before it
encounters a white blood cell and we are infected. Those viruses shroud in our
own glycan, ignored by our immune response. Eventually the liver should clean
them out as old glycan. Notice that this in no way is similar to other immune
response. If the virus encounters or attracts a cell that consumes the viral
glycan, it then will infect that cell. If the infected cell is local, we ignore
its viral load. If it is foreign, there are many foreign cells within us; our
immune system will recognize foreign glycan and coagulation may be extreme.
As with most
coronavirus, we usually encounter this infection and ignore it. Covid19 may
have stronger latency. I have noticed Covid-head, a certain dullness and
irrationality.
If we
vaccinate someone, we increase the viral response. The viral response will not
be sufficient to interdict a cloaked virus. The white blood cells were already
doing their function whenever they encounter a coronavirus. It is a matter of
which cell they encounter first. Increasing immune response is dangerous.
Usually the white blood cells recognize viral particles, but they cannot and
should not recognize their own shrouded viral particles. Infected then subject to vibration, would pop
the heads and could be dire.
There was a
protocol that the first test is on the researcher. I beseech you. Abandon the philosopher’s
stone, the vaccine; pursue science.
Why haven’t
owls eaten all the bats?
Take
reported sick times 10 divided by world’s population I get 2.3%. United States
is 14%. Divide US population by 10 apply the crude mortality rate of 6% to the
sick and I get 2 million dead. Ten is the current true sick ratio. One to
seven, in the US, that you are infected.
Thursday, June 18, 2020
Further Covid19 Speculation
Saturday, June 6, 2020
Covid19 Observations
Friday, May 22, 2020
There Will Be No Covid19 Vaccine
Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Covid19 Facts
Tuesday, April 7, 2020
Covid19 Speculation
Monday, March 9, 2020
Bait
Thursday, February 27, 2020
Bear Act
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
BlogSpot Sucks
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Materialist Mary Poppins
Tuesday, December 3, 2019
Worst President
2. Reagan was just running his mouth, but middle management on both sides was listening. Brave Petrov, Able Archer, Fleetex, KAL 007, Reagan calmed down after he was shot. Both Irishmen believed they had a special relationship with the Soviet Union.
3. Jefferson unleashed Napoleon on Europe. The only real consequence of the Louisiana Purchase was funding Napoleon. Jefferson said he expected Napoleon to attack the British, but the French direction was clear after the Seven Years’ War. Napoleon was a general not an admiral. Dropping guns in Haiti, backstabbing Washington on the loan, stopping the tobacco deal, don’t say it turned out for the best. We don’t know what would have happened. Jefferson was slime.
4. Wilson’s intervention in World War I led to World War II.
5. Teddy Roosevelt was our most popular president. Roosevelt picked the next two presidents. He campaigned for our World War I intervention in support of the British. Roosevelt’s island by island suppression of the Philippines was an example to Japan. Japan and Germany were United States wannabes.
6. Eisenhower was a great general. His selection from the ranks as head of the European theater was a miracle. Unfortunately Eisenhower was a great general. Countless successful interventions of small forces, guns and money throughout the world murdered the idealists and frustrated sovereignty leading to disaster that Eisenhower was no longer around to manage. He was embarrassed in Indonesia. Eisenhower put out the fires without clearing the underbrush. The SOCOM fantasy persists to this day.
7. Jackson, westward expansion and the associated atrocities seem inevitable. But Jackson left us with no shred of decency or self-respect. There was also his financial manipulation in support of the overseas Dutch. Jackson and Van Buren established the Democratic Party which eventually gave us the Civil War.
8. Nixon, Cambodia will suffice.
9. Bush Jr. the MBA chump who fell for Bin-Laden’s provocation. Lead the US out of prosperity and into ruin.
10. Tyler joined the Confederacy.
11. Washington started the Seven Years War. He skimmed the French funds meant for his starving troops. He did keep the British occupied until France could win the Revolution. Without the benefit of gunpowder. If you don’t believe the British could have won, let me refer you to India, China and South Africa. Fortunately the British didn’t send the bad boy who would have dropped guns in the South and burned granaries in the North. Washington’s great mistake as president was sending Jefferson to France. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Jefferson’s job in France was to get the tobacco deal; instead he went to the other side. Jefferson was probably tipped by the Turks. Without the tobacco deal we had Shay’s rebellion. When it was clear that the French weren’t giving the loan in part because of Washington’s even handed policy, Washington was told to grab his hat and not let the door hit him on the way out.
12. Don John is the piƱata for the ecological disaster.
13. Buchanan, pro slavery president just before the Civil War.
14. Andrew Johnson obstructed Reconstruction.
15. Lyndon Johnson got the China Lobby to support his social programs in exchange for the Vietnam War. Johnson is the reason people are terrified of a socialist president. Obama holds him up as the example of change without consensus. And Indonesia.
16. John Adams got the loan from the Dutch and sold out to the British, but his fundamental function was to hold off Jefferson. Only managed one term.
17. Hoover tightened up standards and enforced prohibition before he was elected president; disrupting business arrangements which helped bring on the Depression. Hoover and his cronies supported the Germans. In Hoover’s case because he had worked for the British.
18. Fillmore opened up Japan. That worked out well.
19. Cleveland was such a stinker. The death knell of reconstruction.
20. James Monroe supported Jefferson.
Best President
1. Franklin Roosevelt, you may question his character and policies, but Roosevelt led us through the Great Depression and the Second World War. His appointment of George C. Marshal was great. As was Henry Wallace and Eleanor Roosevelt.
2. Lincoln won the election of 1864. McClellan would have been victory for the South.
3. Ford, modern presidents have the advantage of greater disaster and recovery. I have a soft spot for goodhearted insider conservatives. We could have had John Connally.
4. James Madison wrote the Constitution. Conciliated with Britain. We could have lost the war of 1812. Held on to Maine. Wasn’t named Jimmy.
5. Carter, insufferable sanctimony worsened by being right. Carter creeps up in the rankings. I see why Rosalyn beats him.
6. Truman, someone finally fired McArthur. Held off Dewey.
7. Bush Sr. Adam Smith bemoans the constant cycle of wastrels and saviors in politics. Republicans hold this as their fundamental tenet, the Santa Claus Presidency and opposition to socialism. Bush Sr. was the statesman who lied and saved the Republic. Clinton was smart enough to keep his policies. I would rate Bush Sr. higher except hijacking Carter’s Iran operation in support of Reagan. Also participating in the shooting of two other presidents.
8. Obama should also rate higher. His legacy will forever be marred by his successor. The Department of Justice did not prevent Republicans from fixing the election.
9. John Quincy Adams failed to hold off Jackson, always right, never enough.
There are a number of dynasty, bookend, adversary and conjoined presidents. Did we always elect the wrong one? The various scandals look quaint. Rights usually mean right to have slaves or suppress unions. Empire is judged by atrocity. I have a new respect for meh presidents, who didn’t embarrass us, get caught, or mess up.
Tuesday, September 24, 2019
Damn You, Ken Burns
Monday, May 6, 2019
Brexit
popular posts:
-
I had been sail boarding with my friends in Lake Michigan with little success. Being male, we used our backs rather than our brains. We to...
-
Sorry don't know where else to post. Lot of bloviating. There are probably a lot of reasons for this dumb message and the messages are s...
-
I wrote this shortly after the Democratic Convention: This recent convention solidified five deficiencies of the Democratic Party. Rathe...
-
According to their web site, 2024, at University of Chicago 43% of the teachers are professors. This is better than most schools. By third...
-
Start with fire. You are going to build a fireproof house. Once you have a plan to build a fireproof Los Angeles house build an architectura...
-
1. Kennedy nearly blew up the world. Eisenhower had been waving the bomb around but now there was reprisal. Berlin, Bay of Pigs, Missile Cr...