Any time someone gives you a rate for anything, it’s been jiggered. The unemployment rate is a well-known example. In 2012 the reported unemployment rate was around 8%. If I take the total reported employment of around 134,000,000 then apply it to the total population between 20 and 64 of about 162,000,000 I get around 17%. That seems a little high for 2012 but it gives you an idea of the variance. At this point economists start throwing smoke. Most economics seems to be disputes about rates. Disability, yadda yadda, looking for work, employability, underemployment, I’ve known a lot of deranged people who have jobs. A good rule of thumb seems to be double the reported rate. Google real unemployment and double the rate seems the general conclusion. Given the tremendous amount of data available and studied we should have immediate, accurate and complete information segmented across any desired index of our unemployment. Given that we don’t it is obvio...